Fujifilm X100V and Ricoh GR IIIx are two popular compact cameras in the market, offering high image quality and versatile features in a compact form factor. The Fujifilm X100V is a premium compact camera with a fixed lens and a retro design, while the Ricoh GR IIIx is a compact street photography camera with a normal field of view lens and a minimalist design.
Both cameras offer excellent image quality, but they have different strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different types of photographers and photography styles. In this comparison, we will take a look at the key differences between the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx, and help you choose which camera is right for you.
Build Quality of Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR IIIx
The build quality of the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx is quite different.
The Fujifilm X100V has a premium and retro look with a sturdy metal body and a leather-like skin that provides a comfortable grip and a premium feel. It is designed to withstand everyday use and is weather-sealed, making it suitable for outdoor photography.
On the other hand, the Ricoh GR IIIx has a compact and minimalist design with a magnesium alloy body and a rubber grip. While it is also built to withstand everyday use, it is not weather-sealed like the X100V.
Both cameras are well-built and offer good handling, but the Fujifilm X100V has a more substantial feel and better protection against weather elements.
In terms of build quality, both cameras are excellent choices and provide a high level of durability and reliability.
Ergonomics Fuji X100V vs Ricoh GR IIIx
When comparing the Fuji X100V and Ricoh GR IIIx, both cameras have their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of ergonomics.
The Fuji X100V has a rangefinder-style design, with a thumb rest on the back of the camera and a command dial on the front for easy control. It also has a hybrid viewfinder that allows for both optical and electronic viewing.
The camera features a tactile aperture ring and shutter speed dial, making it easy to adjust settings without having to look at the camera’s controls. The X100V also has a tilting LCD screen, which can be useful for shooting at different angles.
This design is favored by photographers who prefer a more traditional style camera.
On the other hand, the Ricoh GR IIIx has a more compact and minimalistic design, with a limited number of buttons and controls. It is favored by photographers who prefer a more pocketable camera that can be easily carried and used with one hand. The GR IIIx also has a high-resolution touch screen for quick access to settings and a fully electronic viewfinder.
The choice between the two cameras comes down to personal preference and the type of photography one intends to do. The Fuji X100V is ideal for those who want a more traditional and customizable camera, while the Ricoh GR IIIx is great for those who want a more compact and streamlined option.
Weight And Size of Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR IIIx
The Fujifilm X100V weighs 448g (15.8 oz) and measures 126mm x 74.8mm x 53.3mm (4.96″ x 2.94″ x 2.10″). It’s a bit larger and heavier than some other compact cameras, but still small enough to fit in a jacket pocket or small camera bag. The X100V has a relatively solid and sturdy feel, which some photographers may prefer.
The Ricoh GR IIIx, on the other hand, is significantly smaller and lighter, weighing only 262g (9.24 oz) and measuring 109.4 (W) x 61.9 (H) x 35.2(D)mm. It’s one of the smallest and lightest compact cameras available, making it a great option for photographers who need to carry their camera all day.
Autofocus of X100V Vs Ricoh GR IIIx
The autofocus system of a camera plays a critical role in determining its overall performance, especially in fast-paced shooting situations. Both the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx have different autofocus systems that offer different strengths and weaknesses.
The Fujifilm X100V features a hybrid autofocus system that combines contrast-detection and phase-detection autofocus. This system provides quick and accurate autofocus performance, making it a great choice for capturing fast-moving subjects. The X100V also has an updated autofocus system that includes face and eye detection, making it easier to achieve accurate focus on human subjects.
The Ricoh GR IIIx, on the other hand, has a contrast-detection autofocus system that provides reliable autofocus performance. The camera also has a fast autofocus speed and good accuracy, making it a good choice for capturing still subjects. However, the lack of phase-detection autofocus can make it a bit less suitable for fast-moving subjects, compared to the X100V.
Both the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx have different autofocus systems, and the choice between them will depend on the type of photography you do. If you primarily shoot fast-moving subjects, the X100V’s hybrid autofocus system may be the better choice. For fast moving subjects better use the manual focusing options of Ricoh GR IIIx.
Image Quality of X100V Vs Ricoh GR IIIx
Image quality is an important factor when choosing a camera, and both the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx are capable of producing high-quality images. When comparing the two cameras, there are a few key differences to consider when it comes to image quality, both in JPEG and RAW files.
When it comes to JPEG images, the Fujifilm X100V has an advantage in color reproduction and tonality. The camera uses Fujifilm’s signature film simulation modes, which provide a unique look to the images and offer a variety of options for different shooting scenarios. The X100V also has a good level of detail, especially in the mid-to-high ISO range.
The Ricoh GR IIIx also produces good quality JPEG images, with accurate colors and a high level of detail. However, the camera’s image processing algorithms may not be as advanced as those of the X100V, which can result in a slightly less impressive image quality.
When it comes to RAW files, both the X100V and the GR IIIx have excellent image quality and provide a high level of detail and dynamic range. The main difference is the amount of control that you have over the images in post-processing. The X100V has a wider range of editing options and more control over the final image, while the GR IIIx’s RAW files may be more limited in this regard.
Both the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx are capable of producing high-quality images in both JPEG and RAW formats. The choice between them will depend on your preferences for color reproduction and image editing. If you’re looking for a camera that provides a wide range of color options and advanced editing capabilities, the X100V may be the better choice. If you prefer a more straightforward approach to image quality, the GR IIIx may be the better option.
Sensor Of X100V vs Ricoh GR IIIx
The sensor of a camera plays a critical role in determining its overall image quality and performance. When comparing the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx, there are a few key differences to consider when it comes to their sensors.
The Fujifilm X100V features a 26.1-megapixel APS-C size X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor, which provides high image quality and excellent dynamic range. The X-Trans sensor uses a unique color filter array, which reduces moiré and provides excellent detail and resolution. The X100V’s sensor is also capable of capturing high-quality images at high ISO values, making it a good choice for low-light shooting.
The Ricoh GR IIIx, on the other hand, features a 24.2-megapixel APS-C size CMOS sensor, which provides good image quality and excellent low-light performance. The GR IIIx’s sensor provides high dynamic range and excellent detail, making it a good choice for a variety of shooting scenarios. However, it may not be as advanced as the X100V’s X-Trans sensor in terms of color reproduction and detail.
In conclusion, both the Fujifilm X100V and the Ricoh GR IIIx have high-quality sensors that provide excellent image quality and performance. The choice between them will depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a camera with advanced color reproduction and detail, the X100V may be the better choice. If you need a camera with excellent low-light performance and good image quality, the GR IIIx may be the better option.